Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Anyone have experience with wide primes? I was looking at either the 20mm f2.8 or the newer 20 f1.8 I was previously using a 12-24 f4 but it got damaged so I wanted to try something else[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerAJImage-Specific Properties:
>>4309294There’s a 15 3.5 that’s pretty spectacular but you’re giving up a full stop and it’s pricier. I think 20 is the sweet spot in terms of being ultrawide but not looking too crazy. Otherwise there’s the excellent 14-24 f/2.8 holy trinity lens, but that’s a heckin chonker.
>>4309300Nice lens but yeah that thing is massive, plus attached to a giant FF body you got a brick
There's a few modern-ish MF wide primes too, Irix 15 2.4, Rokinon 14 2.4, maybe some others. I don't have any myself though, besides a MF RMC Tokina 24 2.8.There are also some good deals on 17-35 2.8-4 tamron (which is reasonably sized too), but I have no idea how good that is.
The Nikon 17-35 is pretty nice I will say. Temper your expectations, it’s not as good as a 14-24 in the 17-24 range nor as good as the 24-70 from 24-35… but it’s a solid performer taken on its own merits. The 20-35, do not bother.
>>4309255>>14508214https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/brice-rhodes-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-2016-triple-murder-conviction/article_e08c90c8-e149-11ee-ba90-3f2bb0cd6309.htmlRacist KKK white pig retard who discriminates against Asians should kill himself.
Pentax 645n editionPrevious thread>>4307062/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4309697Isn't sharpness a lens thing? And saying fine detail and less grain sort of redundant?
lab fucked up my negs rip, not that my photos were very good or anything but still annoying regardless. need to start deving myself again i guess.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4500Image Height2960Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution3200 dpiVertical Resolution3200 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2024:05:03 18:33:21Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4500Image Height2960
>>4309710pretty demotivated from this roll too[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:03 18:45:42Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1080Image Height1080
>>4309008>>14508214https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/brice-rhodes-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-2016-triple-murder-conviction/article_e08c90c8-e149-11ee-ba90-3f2bb0cd6309.htmlRacist KKK white pig retard who discriminates against Asians should kill himself.
>>4309703hey man i don't go too crazy cleaning the dust off my negatives because i like 'the look' but i do need to know i can trust a film stock. Back to trix for me i guess.
Took my new Ricoh GRiiiX Urban Edition to Toulouse for a weekend. Was great to have a pocketable camera for a change and I haven’t touched my X-T4 since getting the GR. I kinda miss the EVF sometimes but I love the picture quality and 40mm equiv lens.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelRICOH GR IIIxCamera SoftwareRICOH GR IIIx Ver. 1.31Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:13 13:54:30Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1600Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length26.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height853RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeClose View
>>4309590That's called normal saturation Ken
It seems like most phone cameras have the same, or at least very similar image quality these days. And you have more than one focal length
>>4309704Is this the new meme we're using now? I'll be sure to post it in every thread if so.
>>4309590I do use jpg settings in camera for a more film-like look.
>>4308558>>14508214https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/brice-rhodes-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-2016-triple-murder-conviction/article_e08c90c8-e149-11ee-ba90-3f2bb0cd6309.htmlRacist KKK white pig retard who discriminates against Asians should kill himself.
Have you ever been or worked in a dark room, what does it feel like?
>>4309338Washi W was sooo delicateReally interesting texture though, would work great for architecture or abstract landscapes[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOnePlusCamera ModelONE E1003Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiExposure Time1/12 secF-Numberf/2.2ISO Speed Rating1220Lens Aperturef/2.1FlashFlash, AutoFocal Length3.79 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2160Image Height3840Exposure Index367White BalanceAutoGain ControlUnknown
>>4309339Too bad I had a shit phone back then[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiTime (UTC)10:26:44Date (UTC)2016:12:06Color Space InformationsRGBF-Numberf/2.0Focal Length3.79 mmLens Aperturef/2.0Image Width3120Image Height4160FlashNo Flash, CompulsoryRenderingNormalISO Speed Rating4100Exposure Time1/10 sec
>>4309340probably the biggest part of the fun along with >>4309338 and building tiny shadow projecting ustensils[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiTime (UTC)10:09:25Date (UTC)2016:12:13Color Space InformationsRGBF-Numberf/2.0Focal Length3.79 mmLens Aperturef/2.0Image Width3120Image Height4160FlashNo Flash, CompulsoryRenderingNormalISO Speed Rating700Exposure Time1/11 sec
>>4309337Another sinar user spotted. Love that camera system so much.
>>4309340rolling little waves of developer over a big print to evenly reveal ithnnnngg
I'm working with a Nikon D610. I'm trying to figure out if it's possible to take photos with the mirror up and electronic shutter. It's easy enough to get the mirror up, but it always wants to use the mechanical shutter. I want it to be silent and zero vibrations. I've searched around online and through the manual. Can't find anything. Anyone know if this is possible?Also, enjoy an orange cat with his tongue out.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
Does it really save that much time buying a Fuji and not needing to edit the images or you still have to edit them anyway?
>>4309700It's a total waste of any of your resourcesNow wait for the fujislugs to come in and post cope
Of course I edit them anyway, but only the jpeg
How did they get blown the F out by Nikon off all people?>artemis mission back to the moon >using Nikon Z9 instead of glorious German 100mp[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution71 dpiVertical Resolution71 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width750Image Height750Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306240I wouldn't believe that bullshit even if it were taken with a reflex. Because what NASA shows and what they label it as matters a lot more. AI in mirrorless is a concern because it can replace what people would see with an optical device. NASA didn't need AI to fake the moon landing, just a studio and some actors willing to play the part.
>>4306251The evidence is overwhelming. The skepticism has been debunked so many times that you need to believe in AI live editing EVFs to keep up the denial.Russians, due to being low IQ homosexuals, lost the space race. And Nikon was always better than canon
>>4306251congratulations, you're the ultimate retard
>>4306251>noooooo i just won't believe 15,000 6x6 medium format frames of film>a studio is just as good!Stop being a retard.
>>4305916Did you have a stroke
Old thread reached limit. >>4269325Post birds.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D60Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.6 WMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern862Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:19 18:27:46Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating250Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3442Image Height1646RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R5Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/7.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:29 20:33:12Exposure Time1/4000 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length500.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
This one was so screwed up by that cheap filter that I just let our AI overlords take control... I think I also missed focus[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R5Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/7.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:29 22:00:11Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating5000Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length500.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306776
>>4309680cute
>>4306738Unlike the rest of this board, it seems the posters here enjoy photography.You guys are alright.
You can't tell me one real pro of crop sensors. There's absolutely no point of APS-C when full frame exists. It's not as small, compact or economical as micro four thirds nor do you get the resolution and capability of FF. I guess it's just so that people can feel like they're larping as FF. FF is isn't even that much more expensive most of the time so being a poorfag is the only excuse[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 23.0 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2022:01:10 21:03:15Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1024Image Height683
>>4305780>APS-C is pure copium>tries to cope with m43lmao dead mount
>>4305780>M43 makes sense.I'm a brainlet, why is m43 better / different that aps-c?
>>4309611Because he's a gear collector and aps-c is just a touch too close to full frame, so he'd rather buy a much worse camera just to have more variety on his increasingly dusty photography shelf
>>4309611To be frank, micro four thirds has no point unless you think shooting wildlife with a telephoto that functions and renders like someone stacked TCs on full frame sounds appealing, or intend to spend <$1k on your camera and multiple lenses.
>>4305986>I'm selling my m43 lens collectionsame, I decided to sell everything and get an used a7riii + probably a 40mm 2.5After trying a lot of things I realized that I don't really care about the versatility and having several lenses to be able to shoot anything, I find it more stimulating to make do with just one prime and at this point I might as well go for the higher quality so I can masturbate over the details
I just found out these can be really useful for more than just macro, which I found out that are great for getting a 1:1 ratio on your subject.What I didn't know is something like a 105mm/2.8 also makes an outstanding portrait lens along with even an all-around good prime lens. Also typically it'll be cheaper than a similar fast lens. Is this really the best type of lens for all pictures until you need some kind of zoom?
>>4309619Why not? I’m stupid.
>>4309622You actually have the DOF of f2.8 at 1:1It's the light transmission of f4.5
>>4309623So it doesn’t really matter then when using a tripod or additional lighting.
>>4309483Not quite. A macro lens has better control of distortion especially when you focus closer. Regular lenses are not optimized for that.
>>4309622Because the DoF will be so shallow as to be useless.>>4309623I don't, the aperture gets reduced to around f/5.6 at close focus.
Leicafags are an interesting species.This is a thread to try and comprehend the minds of these consumerist retards.Their subreddit, the premier place for Leica fans, has a rule explicitly stating that any photos need to "demonstrate a skill or technique that is incredibly difficult to execute correctly, has not been seen before, or both"All the photos in the subreddit do not fit this idiotic criteria, yet are lauded.99% of the posts there are about people buying gear instead of photos.They care more about being seen with a Leica than actually using it.
There are 4 types of Leicamen>1. "Affluent but clueless"Utterly clueless but benign, just bought a leica because it is the most expensive and therefore the best, simple as. Likely uses a 1D to shoot his cat and a Noctilux to shoot action figures.>2. "I just want a Leica, I JUST want a Leica"They want a leica just because they want a leica and they will never be happy without a leica. Probably bought an MP/MA on finance or own an M8. Would probably make identical images with a Cosina CT-1.>3. "It takes the best photos"Are under the impression that leica cameras simply produce the best photos, end of. Most likely to be a retired dentist. 'Glow', 'Emotion', 'Build quality' etc. Thinks a 12-month CLA turnaround is "reasonable" for german "quality".>4. "The Collector"Just collects them like people collect watches. Probably does not even use them.
>>4309503>Thinks a 12-month CLA turnaround is "reasonable" for german "quality"Of course, that's why every Leicaman needs a second one, as a backup. You can't rush art.
Well, shit.
>>4309503>Cosina CT-1.hey those are pretty nice for what they are
>>4309503>They want a leica just because they want a leica and they will never be happy without a leica.No one else makes a camera that fits the bill.>Compact>Full frame>Still compact after attaching non-shit lenses>Not a snoy
mind-bending colour toning editionPreviously: >>4304692[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3888Image Height2608Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2006:08:09 09:39:25Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length36.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>4309651[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6700Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Focal Length (35mm Equiv)525 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:28 17:49:03Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/6.3Brightness7.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceCloudy WeatherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length350.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.9Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 21:35:54Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length269.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306900>>4306904>>4306977>>4306990>>4306999>>4307002>>4307481Ken, don't you have your own website?
>>4309645>Kodak DCS330Cneat
>>4309655these are way cooler and more expressive than any ken photos>>4309650>you just know
I make images for a living. Happy to answer any questions.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 9Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length24.00 mmImage Width2000Image Height1333RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4309071Same thing.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelFZ-N1Equipment MakePANASONICMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.4Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2021:11:01 13:36:42Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiTime (UTC)17:36:42Date (UTC)2021:11:01Color Space InformationsRGBF-Numberf/2.4Focal Length2.97 mmLens Aperturef/2.3Exposure ModeAutoImage Height3264RenderingNormalScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Index365SharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoImage Width2448Metering ModePatternGain ControlUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoContrastNormalExposure Bias0 EVISO Speed Rating1600Exposure Time1/24 sec
>>4309488Definitely go eat in Queens. Astoria Seafood is sick, Jackson Heights has a bunch of great Indian and Nepalese joints, Flushing has the best Chinese food.Downtown Brooklyn is kind of office-y, the Dumbo waterfront is bougie and gentrified af, but still kinda nice to wander through. I like Prospect Park and surrounding area quite a bit, there’s a good cheap pool hall on Flatbush, Oceans 8. Check out Red Hook maybe, cool area. Public Records and Nowadays are great for dancing, PR has the better sound system.
>>4309525Thanks. Not big on the night scene. Or Eastern food. But I'll have to try the Chinese since this might be the only chance I have to get some decent stuff. I'll be staying near Sunset park for the second half of my trip.
how many fotos do you save, how and where?
>>4309620Oh if you like dim sum East Harbor Palace Seafood. Incredible. 8th Ave in Sunset Park is cool.>>4309626I save every photo I take. I use an OWC Thunderbay 4 with 4x16TB HDDs in a RAID 5 configuration. That is then backed up remotely with Backblaze.
What's the best camera for shooting photography like this?I realize Todd Hido uses a couple different Leicas (which I cannot afford)will Ricoh griii be good for this? I have a Nikon d70s and find it's hard to use.Also. I think because the subject matter is so boring my cell phone can't really do it well enough.
>>4309669>>4309670Nice shots, they really 50mm? They look very tight.
>>4309675APSC sensor. 50mm lens appears more like 85mm.
>>4309676Ah right
This board and its obsession with photographing the corner of buildings.Buy a film camera, adds more soul.
leica seems terrible for this application. get the biggest format you can afford + a tripod>>4309683>>4309600the corner is the most interesting part of a building. would you rather they shoot the walls or roof?
